<b>Error! No TTF font found!</b><?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HISTORY OF ECONOMICS</title>
	<link>http://globaleconomy.viaden.com/2006/06/01/history-of-economics/</link>
	<description>Blog covers global economy problems issues</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 06:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Know-all :)</title>
		<link>http://globaleconomy.viaden.com/2006/06/01/history-of-economics/#comment-6</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2006 00:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://globaleconomy.viaden.com/2006/06/01/history-of-economics/#comment-6</guid>
					<description>I’d like to finish this story. 
So, Marshall's analysis was downplayed, and the work of more formal economists of the 1800s (such as Leon WaIras, Francis Edgeworth, and Antoine Cournot) was seen as the basis of the science of economics. Economic analysis that focuses only on formal interrelationships is called Walrasian economics…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’d like to finish this story.<br />
So, Marshall&#8217;s analysis was downplayed, and the work of more formal economists of the 1800s (such as Leon WaIras, Francis Edgeworth, and Antoine Cournot) was seen as the basis of the science of economics. Economic analysis that focuses only on formal interrelationships is called Walrasian economics…
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
