Error! No TTF font found! individuals at Global Economy

ATTRACTING SKILLED AND ANSKILLED IMMIGRANTS

June 30th, 2006

The immigration market approach can tell us much about the skill composition of the immigrant pool. The self-selected sample of immigrants may be dominated by relatively unskilled persons or it may be composed of persons who are highly skilled. The type of skill-sorting that occurs as people move to whichever country makes them the best offer is far from obvious. Nevertheless, it is one of the most important questions that must be addressed by policy makers; after all, the economic benefits of immigration clearly depend on it. The immigration of unskilled workers may allow U.S. manufacturers and fanners to fill menial jobs that require few skills with relatively low­ wage labor. By contrast, the immigration of skilled workers helps provide staff for universities, hospitals, and scientific laboratories. In addition, the immigration of the unskilled will have a different impact on native labor market conditions, on tax revenues, and on the costs of social programs than the immigration of the skilled.

While more careful study is required, it is useful to examine how income inequality in the country of origin affects the type of immigrant attracted by the United States. Consider two alternative source countries, one with a relatively egalitarian income distribution, such as Sweden, and one with a substantial amount of income inequality. Mexico.

Should highly skilled Swedes migrate to the United States? Because of its egalitarian income distribution, highly skilled Swedes do not earn much more than those less skilled. Therefore, highly skilled Swedes find that their earnings opportunities would increase substantially if they migrated to the United States. By the same token, unskilled Swedes find that their economy protects them from the poor labor market outcomes that would likely befall them if they were to migrate to the United States. The self-selection of the immigrant pool originating in Sweden, while small, tends to encourage the migration of skilled persons.

Should a highly skilled Mexican migrate to the United States? Mexico has substantially more income inequality than the United States. Skilled Mexicans find that the Mexican income structure greatly rewards those skills, while unskilled Mexicans have little protection from poor labor market outcomes. As long as they can afford to migrate, unskilled Mexicans have the most incentive to come to the United States, and skilled Mexicans the least; so Mexicans migrating to the United States are likely to be unskilled.

In the end, persons are matched with countries that reward specific skills they have to offer: this is the central implication of the immigration-market approach. As long as individuals migrate to take advantage of different economic opportunities among countries, there is no reason to presume that the United States will always attract the “best and the brightest” or to presume that the United States will be continually flooded with the least-skilled persons of the source countries.

The skill composition of the immigrants in the foreign­ born population in the United States thus depends on how our offer of economic opportunity compares to the offers made by other host countries and by the migrants’ home country. Immigrants originating in some source countries are likely to be substantially more skilled than immigrants originating in other countries. Changes in U.S. immigration policy as well as changes in economic conditions in the United States and in competing host and source countries will alter the composition of the immigrant flow. The competitiveness of the United States‘ offer in the immigration market, therefore, will largely determine the economic impact of immigration on the United States.

according to the article « Immigration and the economy » by By George J. Borjas (the journal «THE SENIOR ECONOMIST» )

Read the rest of this entry »

WHY CHOOSE TO MIGRATE?

June 29th, 2006

Economists typically assume that individuals choose to behave in ways that maximize their well-being. In this context, immigrants strive to choose the country that offers them the best economic opportunities. There exists a close analogy between the immigration market and the job market. Like persons looking for work, potential migrants enter the market; receive offers from competing host countries and their home country, compare the offers, and make a migration decision.

The immigration market approach reveals the link between the components of the U.S. offer (including economic characteristics and the visa-allocation system dictated by the U.S. immigration policy) and the size of the immigrant flow entering the country. As economic conditions in the United States change (relative to those in other countries), different types of persons find it economically beneficial to migrate. Similarly, whenever Congress changes important aspects of immigration policy, immigration costs are altered for many potential migrants, and a different immigrant flow enters the United States. To assess the benefits and the costs of alternative immigration policies, therefore, it is necessary to determine how key components of America’s offer in the immigration market affect the incentives of potential migrants.

If we assume that individuals move in response to better economic opportunities, it is evident that differences in average income levels among countries are a prime determinant of the size and direction of immigrant flows. Immigrants tend to gravitate from low-income countries to high-income countries. Further, the greater the income differential between the countries, the larger the size of the population flow. For instance, the wage differential between Mexico and the United States is the largest income gap between any two contiguous countries in the world. It is not surprising, therefore, that large migration flows originate in Mexico and move toward the United States, instead of the other way around.

according to the article « Immigration and the economy » by By George J. Borjas (the journal «THE SENIOR ECONOMIST» )

Read the rest of this entry »

THE NATURE OF THE IMMIGRATION MARKET

June 28th, 2006

There are three sets of players in the immigration market: the people contemplating whether to leave their home countries, the governments of immigrants’ home countries, and the governments of the potential host countries. All these players enter the immigration market with different objectives, and it is the interaction among them that leads to a particular sorting among the various countries.
Individuals make the immigration decision by comparing the values of the various alternatives. By considering the financial and legal constraints regulating international migration, they choose the country likely to make them best off. These constraints include individual financial resources. After all, international migration is costly. The costs include direct expenditures, such as out-of-pocket expenses associated with transportation of immigrants and their families to their new homes, and they include indirect costs, such as the income losses associated with spells of unemployment that occur as immigrants look for work in the new country. Because only persons, who have accumulated sufficient wealth and savings, can afford to migrate. the potential migrants’ financial resources obviously influence the immigration decision.
Potential host countries also are important players in the immigration market, for they can encourage, discourage, or prevent the entry of certain groups of persons. In particular, potential host countries are characterized by specific sets of economic opportunities described by existing income distribution, whereby certain types of skills are highly rewarded and others are not; whereby jobs are easily available in some industries but scarce in others; whereby some occupations are in high demand, but high levels of unemployment persist others; whereby persons who experience relatively poor labor market outcomes are subsidized by the welfare state, while persons who experience favorable outcomes are heavily taxed. These differences in income and employment opportunities by skill, industry, and occupation imply that the attractiveness of the economic “offer” made by a host country will vary among migrants.
Host countries also regulate the size and composition of the immigration flow by imposing restrictions on entry according to the potential migrant’s skills, wealth, occupation, political background, moral rectitude, national origin or family relationships with current residents. For example, current U.S. immigration policy makes immigration costs almost prohibitive for persons who do not already have relatives residing here. Other countries, such as Canada and Australia, have a point system in which potential immigrants are screened and graded on the basis of their educational attainment, age, occupation, and other characteristics. Thus, through their immigration policies and their offers of economic opportunities, host countries compete for the human and physical capital of the potential migrants.
The home countries of potential immigrants are the last major players in the immigration market. Their economies also provide a certain set of income and employment opportunities to their residents, and their immigration policies regulate the size and skill composition of the out-going flow. In some countries, like the United States, citizens are free to leave the country whenever they wish, for any duration, and for whatever reason. In other countries, immigration statutes impose large costs and penalties on potential immigrants and make it very difficult for residents to migrate elsewhere. Moreover, such restrictions often control not only the size but also the composition of the immigration flow. For example, the Soviet Union long prevented the exit of any person who worked in sensitive government jobs, and Cuba prohibited the exit of persons in the age group subject to military service.
 according to the article « Immigration and the economy » by By George J. Borjas (the journal «THE SENIOR ECONOMIST» ) 

Read the rest of this entry »

WHAT DO MARKETS DO?

June 27th, 2006

Markets are institutions that regulate transactions among individuals. In some markets, goods such as bicycles or cars are exchanged between buyer and seller. A free-enterprise economy uses prices to allocate the scarce goods among the many persons wishing to own them. Only those persons, willing and able to pay the going price, get the goods. Other markets, such as the labor market, guide the allocation of labor among different firms. In these markets transactions involve the exchange of monetary compensation from buyer to seller of the good being purchased.
All markets share two features. They provide the rules of the game in which exchanges are made, and they determine, through the interaction of players in the marketplace, a certain allocation of the scarce resources among competing users. In other words, only a subset of persons will own the limited number of bicycles: and firms and employees will be “married” in a particular sorting of workers to jobs.
There also exists an immigration market, one that allocates persons wishing to leave their current countries of residence among the few countries willing to admit them. Potential migrants, like workers looking for a job, are looking for the best country they can live in. Host countries, like firms looking for specific types of workers, set immigration policies so that they can attract specific types of migrants. Just as the labor market guides the allocation of workers to firms, the immigration market guides the allocation of persons to countries.
The existence of an immigration market implies that countries compete for the physical and human capital of immigrants, that the particular sorting of persons and countries depends on how the offers to potential immigrants differ among the competing countries, and that there will be winners and losers in this competition. Changes in immigration policies alter the flow of immigrants to particular countries.
 according to the article « Immigration and the economy » by By George J. Borjas (the journal «THE SENIOR ECONOMIST» ) 

Read the rest of this entry »

JOINT VENTURE AS A FORM OF INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION

June 13th, 2006

A joint venture is a legal organization that takes the form of a short term partnership in which the persons jointly undertake a transaction for mutual profit. Generally each person contributes assets and share risks. Like a partnership, joint ventures can involve any type of business transaction and the “persons” involved can be individuals, groups of individuals, companies, or corporations.
Joint ventures are also widely used by companies to gain entrance into foreign markets. Foreign companies form joint ventures with domestic companies already present in markets the foreign companies would like to enter. The foreign companies generally bring new technologies and business practices into the joint venture, while the domestic companies already have the relationships and requisite governmental documents within the country along with being entrenched in the domestic industry.
The reasons behind the formation of a joint venture often include business expansion, development of new products or moving into new markets, particularly overseas.
Your business may have strong potential for growth, and you may have innovative ideas and products, but could still benefit from:

more resources;
greater capacity;
increased technical expertise;
established distribution channels.

Entering into a joint venture is a major decision. This guide introduces the advantages and disadvantages.
Businesses can often achieve unexpected gains through joint ventures with a partner. Businesses of any size can use joint ventures to strengthen long-term relationships or to collaborate on short-term projects.
A successful joint venture can offer:

access to new markets and distribution networks;
increased capacity;
sharing of risks with a partner;
access to specialized staff and technology.

A joint venture can also be very flexible. For example, a joint venture can have a limited life span and only cover part of what you do, thus limiting both your commitment and the business’ exposure.
Joint ventures are a popular form of co-operation between businesses in different countries in areas such as transport, tourism and hotels.

THE GENDER PROBLEM IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS: THE WAYS OF SOLUTION IN BELARUS

June 12th, 2006

Blog Directory

Web Directory

Also there were a lot of different students’ conferences this year. And I didn’t lose the opportunity to participate in them. One of my reports was devoted to gender problem in international business. And now I’d like to tell you about the most interesting parts of it…

Women have made great strides over the last century in areas where they were not historically equal to men; they gained the right to vote, they removed the barriers to traditionally male professions, and they changed the way society looked at them. Women are no longer viewed as primarily «emotional» creatures, but are judged on their individual qualities.

But the gender problem is still burning all over the world and especially in the countries of the former USSR, Belarus is no exception. The fact that there is still women and men’s work, and still separate play for boys and girls, show how these are apparent even today. By breaking down these stereotypes and allowing men - or women - to be as feminine or masculine as they choose give them a chance to be individuals. And that is why the United Nations Development Programme supports the idea of expanding the public space for women in Belarus.

This Project is for women aspiring to social, political and professional success; for men willing to support active women’ striving for self-realization and for anyone interested in the sustainable democratic development of Belarus.

Society creates artificial barriers in the way of women’s professional, political and social careers thus depriving itself of the great potential that this social group possesses. Gender equality is a prerequisite to the effective development of this country. The goal of the Project is to ensure the real access to the sphere of decision-making for Belarusian women.

In order to feel motivated, reach out and participate in the decision-making women must first attain self-affirmation. Up-to-date education, relevant knowledge and skills are all ingredients of success that would allow women to become leaders. The Project provides an opportunity to get the education that fits women’s needs, status and employment.

Providing equal opportunities means not only that women must be able to gain the education that would allow them to access such traditionally masculine spheres as big politics, serious business, higher levels of power. Equal opportunities are founded, first and foremost, on equal rights. The Project calls for expanding women’s impact on the legislative process to ensure the gender equality in the society.

Women who aspire to participate in decision-making face an invisible obstacle in the form of the public opinion. The stereotypical view on the limited role of women in the public sphere unfortunately still exists in our society. It cultivates in women the predisposition to passiveness and dependence, and, at best, provides them with a sort of a greenhouse – a limited scope of possibilities of personal self-realization.

Women who have strength, knowledge and ambition to participate in public life want to step outside the greenhouse and into a real world. Yet, too often they cannot declare their aspirations because of the social disapproval that would follow.

The Project aims at working with Mass Media to facilitate the change of public opinion and create a friendlier social environment for women. Creation of social advertising is one direction of work with mass-media. The social advertising, that were created during such cooperation, got two first prizes in nominations «Noncommercial printed advertising» and «Video advertising» in the Seventh world festival of advertising «Idea! 2006» and two first prizes in the fourth Kiev International Festival of Advertising.

It is important to consider the gender inequality as an economic problem, not only social one!

Women represent the biggest social - demographic group in Belarus. There are above 5,000,000 women that make up 53 % of all the population living in this country. Today women face with excessive loadings on work, growth of unemployment and poverty. In each branch of the economy there are significant distinctions in the incomes received by men and women. The average wages of women make 81 % from average wages of men. In spite of the fact, that women and men have the same educational level.

Thus, the gender problem is really urgent in our society because having refused from a social equality of men and women we refuse huge prospects of successful economic development of our country.

WHEN AT ROME, DO AS THE ROMANS DO (ending)

May 25th, 2006

Blog Directory - Add Link

Blog Directory & Search engine

Directory of Business Blogs

Don’t look a gift horse in the mouth. :)

But nevertheless you should know bout recommended gifts, gifts to avoid, good and bad colours for wrapping paper in some countries. And of course it will be very good if you will know how present a gift to individuals and groups.

Gift Giving

Japan:

- Gift-giving is an important part of Japanese business protocol.

- An expensive gift will not be a bribe.

- Present gifts with both hands.

- Gifts are opened in private, because if the gift turns out to be a poor choice, “loss of face” will result.

- Before accepting a gift, it is polite to modestly refuse at least once or twice before finally accepting.

- Ensure that your gifts are wrapped. The safest gift-wrapping choices are pastel-colored papers, without bows.

Gifts to Avoid:

- Lilies, lotus blossoms, and camellias are associated with funerals. White flowers of any kind should be avoided.

- Giving four or nine of anything is considered unlucky.

- Red Christmas cards should be avoided, since funeral notices are customarily printed in this colour. There is also a superstition that potted plants encourage sickness.

China:

- Today, official policy in Chinese business culture forbids giving gifts; this gesture is considered bribery, an illegal act in this country. In many organizations, however, attitude to gifts are beginning to relax.

- The Chinese will decline a gift three times before finally accepting, so as not to appear greedy.

- If possible, have your gifts wrapped in red paper, which is considered a lucky colour.

- Wrapping in yellow paper with black writing is a gift given only to the dead.

Gifts to Avoid

- Numbers such as ‘73′ meaning ‘the funeral’ and ‘84′ meaning ‘having accidents’ are to be avoided.

- Scissors, knives, or other sharp objects

- The following items are to be avoided as they are associated with funerals: handkerchiefs, gifts or wrapping paper in white, black, or blue

The following items are to be avoided as they are associated with funerals: clocks, four of any item [the Cantonese word for “four” sounds similar, in the same language, to “death”]

India:

- Gift giving is customary in India, and is seen as a sign of friendship.

- It is advisable not to give expensive gifts, unless you are very close to the person.

- Normally, gifts are not opened in the presence of the giver. However, sometimes your Indian host may insist on your opening the gift, and would expect appreciation for his/her choice.

- Alcohol is culturally not accepted in most parts of India.

- Be cautious in giving a leather item as a gift. Since many Indians are vegetarians, they may not appreciate items made of leather.

Spain:

- In ordinary Spanish business culture, however, gifts are usually given only at the conclusion of successful negotiations.

- If you receive a gift, you should open it immediately and in front of the giver.

- When offering any gift, you should ensure that it is a high-quality item [perhaps a brand-name] and that it is finely wrapped.

- You should not give anything too extravagant as your generosity may be perceived as a bribe.

France:

- French business etiquette dictates that you don’t include your business card with a gift.

This page is generated by Wpkeys plugin